Pages

Friday, April 19, 2013

Broadcast secretary performance appraisal




You can use suggestions below to make performance appraisal for Broadcast secretary. You should that the appraisal depends on appraisal method (ref 11 methods of performance appraisal), appraisal form (ref top 20 performance appraisal forms) and appraisal system.
                                                             

1. Employee Details


• Employee Name
• Review Period
• Position
• Date of joining
• Department
• Review Date
• Line Manager

 

2. Work performance of Broadcast secretary


How to identify work performance of Broadcast secretary?

• Setting up KRA, duties, responsibilities.
• Identify weight point of each KRA/duty/responsibility.

Using the 4-point scale below, please assess your employee performance in the following areas:

• 4 – Performance was always successful, consistent and respectable and at times clearly superior and exceeding standards.
• 3.5 – Performance was at most times clearly superior and exceeding standards.
• 3 – Performance was successful, consistent, and respectable in every regard with few exceptions.
• 2.5 – Performance at times was inconsistent and did not meet standards.
• 2 – Performance at most times was inconsistent and did not always meet standards.
• 1 – Performance was overall unsuccessful and unacceptable with regard to expectations and the requirements of the position.

Then, you can create a table with columns: No, KRAs, weight, performance score, descriptions.

 

3. Job objectives of Broadcast secretary


List the objectives you set out for your staff (Broadcast secretary) to achieve in the past 12 months (or the period covered by this appraisal) with the measures or standards agreed – against each comment on achievement or otherwise, with reasons where appropriate.

Score the performance against each objective (1-3 = poor, 4-6 = satisfactory, 7-9 = good, 10 = excellent):

Then you create a table with columns: No – Objectives – Measure/standard - Score - Comment

 

4. Job competencies


Discuss and agree the skills, capabilities and experience required for competence in current role, and if appropriate, for readiness to progress to the next role or roles.

Using the 4 point scale below, fill up the following table:

• 4 – Exceeds expectations
• 3.5 – Somewhat Exceeds Expectations
• 3 – Meets expectations
• 2.5 – Somewhat meets expectations
• 2 – Less than expectations
• 1.5 – Somewhat less than expectations
• 1 – Inadequately short of expectations 4

 

5. Career development of Broadcast secretary


Discuss and agree (as far as is possible, given budgetary, availability and authorisation considerations) the training and development support to be given to help the appraisee meet the agreed objectives above.

 

6. Overall rating of Broadcast secretary:


• Exceptional
• Strong
• Fully Competent
• Continued Development
• Poor
• New to Position

Other comments:

 

7. Signatures


Name of Manager
Designation
Signature
Date

Appraisal acceptable to Employee: Yes / No Date
Signature

Broadcast secretary’s Signature
Comments, if any
New Title (if applicable)
Date

Distribution: (1) Copy to HR departmental Personnel File (2) Copy to line manager. (3) Copy to Manager / Supervisor.

Please note that, forms of performance appraisal can be peer form, self-appraisal form, sub-ordinate form, 360 degree form, MBO template, review phrases, HR dept comments…

Broadcast specialist performance appraisal




You can use suggestions below to make performance appraisal for Broadcast specialist. You should that the appraisal depends on appraisal method (ref 11 methods of performance appraisal), appraisal form (ref top 20 performance appraisal forms) and appraisal system.
                                                             

1. Employee Details


• Employee Name
• Review Period
• Position
• Date of joining
• Department
• Review Date
• Line Manager

 

2. Work performance of Broadcast specialist


How to identify work performance of Broadcast specialist?

• Setting up KRA, duties, responsibilities.
• Identify weight point of each KRA/duty/responsibility.

Using the 4-point scale below, please assess your employee performance in the following areas:

• 4 – Performance was always successful, consistent and respectable and at times clearly superior and exceeding standards.
• 3.5 – Performance was at most times clearly superior and exceeding standards.
• 3 – Performance was successful, consistent, and respectable in every regard with few exceptions.
• 2.5 – Performance at times was inconsistent and did not meet standards.
• 2 – Performance at most times was inconsistent and did not always meet standards.
• 1 – Performance was overall unsuccessful and unacceptable with regard to expectations and the requirements of the position.

Then, you can create a table with columns: No, KRAs, weight, performance score, descriptions.

 

3. Job objectives of Broadcast specialist


List the objectives you set out for your staff (Broadcast specialist) to achieve in the past 12 months (or the period covered by this appraisal) with the measures or standards agreed – against each comment on achievement or otherwise, with reasons where appropriate.

Score the performance against each objective (1-3 = poor, 4-6 = satisfactory, 7-9 = good, 10 = excellent):

Then you create a table with columns: No – Objectives – Measure/standard - Score - Comment

 

4. Job competencies


Discuss and agree the skills, capabilities and experience required for competence in current role, and if appropriate, for readiness to progress to the next role or roles.

Using the 4 point scale below, fill up the following table:

• 4 – Exceeds expectations
• 3.5 – Somewhat Exceeds Expectations
• 3 – Meets expectations
• 2.5 – Somewhat meets expectations
• 2 – Less than expectations
• 1.5 – Somewhat less than expectations
• 1 – Inadequately short of expectations 4

 

5. Career development of Broadcast specialist


Discuss and agree (as far as is possible, given budgetary, availability and authorisation considerations) the training and development support to be given to help the appraisee meet the agreed objectives above.

 

6. Overall rating of Broadcast specialist:


• Exceptional
• Strong
• Fully Competent
• Continued Development
• Poor
• New to Position

Other comments:

 

7. Signatures


Name of Manager
Designation
Signature
Date

Appraisal acceptable to Employee: Yes / No Date
Signature

Broadcast specialist’s Signature
Comments, if any
New Title (if applicable)
Date

Distribution: (1) Copy to HR departmental Personnel File (2) Copy to line manager. (3) Copy to Manager / Supervisor.

Please note that, forms of performance appraisal can be peer form, self-appraisal form, sub-ordinate form, 360 degree form, MBO template, review phrases, HR dept comments…

Broadcast representative performance appraisal




You can use suggestions below to make performance appraisal for Broadcast representative. You should that the appraisal depends on appraisal method (ref 11 methods of performance appraisal), appraisal form (ref top 20 performance appraisal forms) and appraisal system.
                                                             

1. Employee Details


• Employee Name
• Review Period
• Position
• Date of joining
• Department
• Review Date
• Line Manager

 

2. Work performance of Broadcast representative


How to identify work performance of Broadcast representative?

• Setting up KRA, duties, responsibilities.
• Identify weight point of each KRA/duty/responsibility.

Using the 4-point scale below, please assess your employee performance in the following areas:

• 4 – Performance was always successful, consistent and respectable and at times clearly superior and exceeding standards.
• 3.5 – Performance was at most times clearly superior and exceeding standards.
• 3 – Performance was successful, consistent, and respectable in every regard with few exceptions.
• 2.5 – Performance at times was inconsistent and did not meet standards.
• 2 – Performance at most times was inconsistent and did not always meet standards.
• 1 – Performance was overall unsuccessful and unacceptable with regard to expectations and the requirements of the position.

Then, you can create a table with columns: No, KRAs, weight, performance score, descriptions.

 

3. Job objectives of Broadcast representative


List the objectives you set out for your staff (Broadcast representative) to achieve in the past 12 months (or the period covered by this appraisal) with the measures or standards agreed – against each comment on achievement or otherwise, with reasons where appropriate.

Score the performance against each objective (1-3 = poor, 4-6 = satisfactory, 7-9 = good, 10 = excellent):

Then you create a table with columns: No – Objectives – Measure/standard - Score - Comment

 

4. Job competencies


Discuss and agree the skills, capabilities and experience required for competence in current role, and if appropriate, for readiness to progress to the next role or roles.

Using the 4 point scale below, fill up the following table:

• 4 – Exceeds expectations
• 3.5 – Somewhat Exceeds Expectations
• 3 – Meets expectations
• 2.5 – Somewhat meets expectations
• 2 – Less than expectations
• 1.5 – Somewhat less than expectations
• 1 – Inadequately short of expectations 4

 

5. Career development of Broadcast representative


Discuss and agree (as far as is possible, given budgetary, availability and authorisation considerations) the training and development support to be given to help the appraisee meet the agreed objectives above.

 

6. Overall rating of Broadcast representative:


• Exceptional
• Strong
• Fully Competent
• Continued Development
• Poor
• New to Position

Other comments:

 

7. Signatures


Name of Manager
Designation
Signature
Date

Appraisal acceptable to Employee: Yes / No Date
Signature

Broadcast representative’s Signature
Comments, if any
New Title (if applicable)
Date

Distribution: (1) Copy to HR departmental Personnel File (2) Copy to line manager. (3) Copy to Manager / Supervisor.

Please note that, forms of performance appraisal can be peer form, self-appraisal form, sub-ordinate form, 360 degree form, MBO template, review phrases, HR dept comments…

Broadcast officer performance appraisal




You can use suggestions below to make performance appraisal for Broadcast officer. You should that the appraisal depends on appraisal method (ref 11 methods of performance appraisal), appraisal form (ref top 20 performance appraisal forms) and appraisal system.
                                                             

1. Employee Details


• Employee Name
• Review Period
• Position
• Date of joining
• Department
• Review Date
• Line Manager

 

2. Work performance of Broadcast officer


How to identify work performance of Broadcast officer?

• Setting up KRA, duties, responsibilities.
• Identify weight point of each KRA/duty/responsibility.

Using the 4-point scale below, please assess your employee performance in the following areas:

• 4 – Performance was always successful, consistent and respectable and at times clearly superior and exceeding standards.
• 3.5 – Performance was at most times clearly superior and exceeding standards.
• 3 – Performance was successful, consistent, and respectable in every regard with few exceptions.
• 2.5 – Performance at times was inconsistent and did not meet standards.
• 2 – Performance at most times was inconsistent and did not always meet standards.
• 1 – Performance was overall unsuccessful and unacceptable with regard to expectations and the requirements of the position.

Then, you can create a table with columns: No, KRAs, weight, performance score, descriptions.

 

3. Job objectives of Broadcast officer


List the objectives you set out for your staff (Broadcast officer) to achieve in the past 12 months (or the period covered by this appraisal) with the measures or standards agreed – against each comment on achievement or otherwise, with reasons where appropriate.

Score the performance against each objective (1-3 = poor, 4-6 = satisfactory, 7-9 = good, 10 = excellent):

Then you create a table with columns: No – Objectives – Measure/standard - Score - Comment

 

4. Job competencies


Discuss and agree the skills, capabilities and experience required for competence in current role, and if appropriate, for readiness to progress to the next role or roles.

Using the 4 point scale below, fill up the following table:

• 4 – Exceeds expectations
• 3.5 – Somewhat Exceeds Expectations
• 3 – Meets expectations
• 2.5 – Somewhat meets expectations
• 2 – Less than expectations
• 1.5 – Somewhat less than expectations
• 1 – Inadequately short of expectations 4

 

5. Career development of Broadcast officer


Discuss and agree (as far as is possible, given budgetary, availability and authorisation considerations) the training and development support to be given to help the appraisee meet the agreed objectives above.

 

6. Overall rating of Broadcast officer:


• Exceptional
• Strong
• Fully Competent
• Continued Development
• Poor
• New to Position

Other comments:

 

7. Signatures


Name of Manager
Designation
Signature
Date

Appraisal acceptable to Employee: Yes / No Date
Signature

Broadcast officer’s Signature
Comments, if any
New Title (if applicable)
Date

Distribution: (1) Copy to HR departmental Personnel File (2) Copy to line manager. (3) Copy to Manager / Supervisor.

Please note that, forms of performance appraisal can be peer form, self-appraisal form, sub-ordinate form, 360 degree form, MBO template, review phrases, HR dept comments…

Broadcast manager performance appraisal




You can use suggestions below to make performance appraisal for Broadcast manager. You should that the appraisal depends on appraisal method (ref 11 methods of performance appraisal), appraisal form (ref top 20 performance appraisal forms) and appraisal system.
                                                             

1. Employee Details


• Employee Name
• Review Period
• Position
• Date of joining
• Department
• Review Date
• Line Manager

 

2. Work performance of Broadcast manager


How to identify work performance of Broadcast manager?

• Setting up KRA, duties, responsibilities.
• Identify weight point of each KRA/duty/responsibility.

Using the 4-point scale below, please assess your employee performance in the following areas:

• 4 – Performance was always successful, consistent and respectable and at times clearly superior and exceeding standards.
• 3.5 – Performance was at most times clearly superior and exceeding standards.
• 3 – Performance was successful, consistent, and respectable in every regard with few exceptions.
• 2.5 – Performance at times was inconsistent and did not meet standards.
• 2 – Performance at most times was inconsistent and did not always meet standards.
• 1 – Performance was overall unsuccessful and unacceptable with regard to expectations and the requirements of the position.

Then, you can create a table with columns: No, KRAs, weight, performance score, descriptions.

 

3. Job objectives of Broadcast manager


List the objectives you set out for your staff (Broadcast manager) to achieve in the past 12 months (or the period covered by this appraisal) with the measures or standards agreed – against each comment on achievement or otherwise, with reasons where appropriate.

Score the performance against each objective (1-3 = poor, 4-6 = satisfactory, 7-9 = good, 10 = excellent):

Then you create a table with columns: No – Objectives – Measure/standard - Score - Comment

 

4. Job competencies


Discuss and agree the skills, capabilities and experience required for competence in current role, and if appropriate, for readiness to progress to the next role or roles.

Using the 4 point scale below, fill up the following table:

• 4 – Exceeds expectations
• 3.5 – Somewhat Exceeds Expectations
• 3 – Meets expectations
• 2.5 – Somewhat meets expectations
• 2 – Less than expectations
• 1.5 – Somewhat less than expectations
• 1 – Inadequately short of expectations 4

 

5. Career development of Broadcast manager


Discuss and agree (as far as is possible, given budgetary, availability and authorisation considerations) the training and development support to be given to help the appraisee meet the agreed objectives above.

 

6. Overall rating of Broadcast manager:


• Exceptional
• Strong
• Fully Competent
• Continued Development
• Poor
• New to Position

Other comments:

 

7. Signatures


Name of Manager
Designation
Signature
Date

Appraisal acceptable to Employee: Yes / No Date
Signature

Broadcast manager’s Signature
Comments, if any
New Title (if applicable)
Date

Distribution: (1) Copy to HR departmental Personnel File (2) Copy to line manager. (3) Copy to Manager / Supervisor.

Please note that, forms of performance appraisal can be peer form, self-appraisal form, sub-ordinate form, 360 degree form, MBO template, review phrases, HR dept comments…

Broadcast leader performance appraisal




You can use suggestions below to make performance appraisal for Broadcast leader. You should that the appraisal depends on appraisal method (ref 11 methods of performance appraisal), appraisal form (ref top 20 performance appraisal forms) and appraisal system.
                                                             

1. Employee Details


• Employee Name
• Review Period
• Position
• Date of joining
• Department
• Review Date
• Line Manager

 

2. Work performance of Broadcast leader


How to identify work performance of Broadcast leader?

• Setting up KRA, duties, responsibilities.
• Identify weight point of each KRA/duty/responsibility.

Using the 4-point scale below, please assess your employee performance in the following areas:

• 4 – Performance was always successful, consistent and respectable and at times clearly superior and exceeding standards.
• 3.5 – Performance was at most times clearly superior and exceeding standards.
• 3 – Performance was successful, consistent, and respectable in every regard with few exceptions.
• 2.5 – Performance at times was inconsistent and did not meet standards.
• 2 – Performance at most times was inconsistent and did not always meet standards.
• 1 – Performance was overall unsuccessful and unacceptable with regard to expectations and the requirements of the position.

Then, you can create a table with columns: No, KRAs, weight, performance score, descriptions.

 

3. Job objectives of Broadcast leader


List the objectives you set out for your staff (Broadcast leader) to achieve in the past 12 months (or the period covered by this appraisal) with the measures or standards agreed – against each comment on achievement or otherwise, with reasons where appropriate.

Score the performance against each objective (1-3 = poor, 4-6 = satisfactory, 7-9 = good, 10 = excellent):

Then you create a table with columns: No – Objectives – Measure/standard - Score - Comment

 

4. Job competencies


Discuss and agree the skills, capabilities and experience required for competence in current role, and if appropriate, for readiness to progress to the next role or roles.

Using the 4 point scale below, fill up the following table:

• 4 – Exceeds expectations
• 3.5 – Somewhat Exceeds Expectations
• 3 – Meets expectations
• 2.5 – Somewhat meets expectations
• 2 – Less than expectations
• 1.5 – Somewhat less than expectations
• 1 – Inadequately short of expectations 4

 

5. Career development of Broadcast leader


Discuss and agree (as far as is possible, given budgetary, availability and authorisation considerations) the training and development support to be given to help the appraisee meet the agreed objectives above.

 

6. Overall rating of Broadcast leader:


• Exceptional
• Strong
• Fully Competent
• Continued Development
• Poor
• New to Position

Other comments:

 

7. Signatures


Name of Manager
Designation
Signature
Date

Appraisal acceptable to Employee: Yes / No Date
Signature

Broadcast leader’s Signature
Comments, if any
New Title (if applicable)
Date

Distribution: (1) Copy to HR departmental Personnel File (2) Copy to line manager. (3) Copy to Manager / Supervisor.

Please note that, forms of performance appraisal can be peer form, self-appraisal form, sub-ordinate form, 360 degree form, MBO template, review phrases, HR dept comments…

Broadcast intern performance appraisal




You can use suggestions below to make performance appraisal for Broadcast intern. You should that the appraisal depends on appraisal method (ref 11 methods of performance appraisal), appraisal form (ref top 20 performance appraisal forms) and appraisal system.
                                                             

1. Employee Details


• Employee Name
• Review Period
• Position
• Date of joining
• Department
• Review Date
• Line Manager

 

2. Work performance of Broadcast intern


How to identify work performance of Broadcast intern?

• Setting up KRA, duties, responsibilities.
• Identify weight point of each KRA/duty/responsibility.

Using the 4-point scale below, please assess your employee performance in the following areas:

• 4 – Performance was always successful, consistent and respectable and at times clearly superior and exceeding standards.
• 3.5 – Performance was at most times clearly superior and exceeding standards.
• 3 – Performance was successful, consistent, and respectable in every regard with few exceptions.
• 2.5 – Performance at times was inconsistent and did not meet standards.
• 2 – Performance at most times was inconsistent and did not always meet standards.
• 1 – Performance was overall unsuccessful and unacceptable with regard to expectations and the requirements of the position.

Then, you can create a table with columns: No, KRAs, weight, performance score, descriptions.

 

3. Job objectives of Broadcast intern


List the objectives you set out for your staff (Broadcast intern) to achieve in the past 12 months (or the period covered by this appraisal) with the measures or standards agreed – against each comment on achievement or otherwise, with reasons where appropriate.

Score the performance against each objective (1-3 = poor, 4-6 = satisfactory, 7-9 = good, 10 = excellent):

Then you create a table with columns: No – Objectives – Measure/standard - Score - Comment

 

4. Job competencies


Discuss and agree the skills, capabilities and experience required for competence in current role, and if appropriate, for readiness to progress to the next role or roles.

Using the 4 point scale below, fill up the following table:

• 4 – Exceeds expectations
• 3.5 – Somewhat Exceeds Expectations
• 3 – Meets expectations
• 2.5 – Somewhat meets expectations
• 2 – Less than expectations
• 1.5 – Somewhat less than expectations
• 1 – Inadequately short of expectations 4

 

5. Career development of Broadcast intern


Discuss and agree (as far as is possible, given budgetary, availability and authorisation considerations) the training and development support to be given to help the appraisee meet the agreed objectives above.

 

6. Overall rating of Broadcast intern:


• Exceptional
• Strong
• Fully Competent
• Continued Development
• Poor
• New to Position

Other comments:

 

7. Signatures


Name of Manager
Designation
Signature
Date

Appraisal acceptable to Employee: Yes / No Date
Signature

Broadcast intern’s Signature
Comments, if any
New Title (if applicable)
Date

Distribution: (1) Copy to HR departmental Personnel File (2) Copy to line manager. (3) Copy to Manager / Supervisor.

Please note that, forms of performance appraisal can be peer form, self-appraisal form, sub-ordinate form, 360 degree form, MBO template, review phrases, HR dept comments…

Broadcast engineer performance appraisal




You can use suggestions below to make performance appraisal for Broadcast engineer. You should that the appraisal depends on appraisal method (ref 11 methods of performance appraisal), appraisal form (ref top 20 performance appraisal forms) and appraisal system.
                                                             

1. Employee Details


• Employee Name
• Review Period
• Position
• Date of joining
• Department
• Review Date
• Line Manager

 

2. Work performance of Broadcast engineer


How to identify work performance of Broadcast engineer?

• Setting up KRA, duties, responsibilities.
• Identify weight point of each KRA/duty/responsibility.

Using the 4-point scale below, please assess your employee performance in the following areas:

• 4 – Performance was always successful, consistent and respectable and at times clearly superior and exceeding standards.
• 3.5 – Performance was at most times clearly superior and exceeding standards.
• 3 – Performance was successful, consistent, and respectable in every regard with few exceptions.
• 2.5 – Performance at times was inconsistent and did not meet standards.
• 2 – Performance at most times was inconsistent and did not always meet standards.
• 1 – Performance was overall unsuccessful and unacceptable with regard to expectations and the requirements of the position.

Then, you can create a table with columns: No, KRAs, weight, performance score, descriptions.

 

3. Job objectives of Broadcast engineer


List the objectives you set out for your staff (Broadcast engineer) to achieve in the past 12 months (or the period covered by this appraisal) with the measures or standards agreed – against each comment on achievement or otherwise, with reasons where appropriate.

Score the performance against each objective (1-3 = poor, 4-6 = satisfactory, 7-9 = good, 10 = excellent):

Then you create a table with columns: No – Objectives – Measure/standard - Score - Comment

 

4. Job competencies


Discuss and agree the skills, capabilities and experience required for competence in current role, and if appropriate, for readiness to progress to the next role or roles.

Using the 4 point scale below, fill up the following table:

• 4 – Exceeds expectations
• 3.5 – Somewhat Exceeds Expectations
• 3 – Meets expectations
• 2.5 – Somewhat meets expectations
• 2 – Less than expectations
• 1.5 – Somewhat less than expectations
• 1 – Inadequately short of expectations 4

 

5. Career development of Broadcast engineer


Discuss and agree (as far as is possible, given budgetary, availability and authorisation considerations) the training and development support to be given to help the appraisee meet the agreed objectives above.

 

6. Overall rating of Broadcast engineer:


• Exceptional
• Strong
• Fully Competent
• Continued Development
• Poor
• New to Position

Other comments:

 

7. Signatures


Name of Manager
Designation
Signature
Date

Appraisal acceptable to Employee: Yes / No Date
Signature

Broadcast engineer’s Signature
Comments, if any
New Title (if applicable)
Date

Distribution: (1) Copy to HR departmental Personnel File (2) Copy to line manager. (3) Copy to Manager / Supervisor.

Please note that, forms of performance appraisal can be peer form, self-appraisal form, sub-ordinate form, 360 degree form, MBO template, review phrases, HR dept comments…

Broadcast executive performance appraisal




You can use suggestions below to make performance appraisal for Broadcast executive. You should that the appraisal depends on appraisal method (ref 11 methods of performance appraisal), appraisal form (ref top 20 performance appraisal forms) and appraisal system.
                                                             

1. Employee Details


• Employee Name
• Review Period
• Position
• Date of joining
• Department
• Review Date
• Line Manager

 

2. Work performance of Broadcast executive


How to identify work performance of Broadcast executive?

• Setting up KRA, duties, responsibilities.
• Identify weight point of each KRA/duty/responsibility.

Using the 4-point scale below, please assess your employee performance in the following areas:

• 4 – Performance was always successful, consistent and respectable and at times clearly superior and exceeding standards.
• 3.5 – Performance was at most times clearly superior and exceeding standards.
• 3 – Performance was successful, consistent, and respectable in every regard with few exceptions.
• 2.5 – Performance at times was inconsistent and did not meet standards.
• 2 – Performance at most times was inconsistent and did not always meet standards.
• 1 – Performance was overall unsuccessful and unacceptable with regard to expectations and the requirements of the position.

Then, you can create a table with columns: No, KRAs, weight, performance score, descriptions.

 

3. Job objectives of Broadcast executive


List the objectives you set out for your staff (Broadcast executive) to achieve in the past 12 months (or the period covered by this appraisal) with the measures or standards agreed – against each comment on achievement or otherwise, with reasons where appropriate.

Score the performance against each objective (1-3 = poor, 4-6 = satisfactory, 7-9 = good, 10 = excellent):

Then you create a table with columns: No – Objectives – Measure/standard - Score - Comment

 

4. Job competencies


Discuss and agree the skills, capabilities and experience required for competence in current role, and if appropriate, for readiness to progress to the next role or roles.

Using the 4 point scale below, fill up the following table:

• 4 – Exceeds expectations
• 3.5 – Somewhat Exceeds Expectations
• 3 – Meets expectations
• 2.5 – Somewhat meets expectations
• 2 – Less than expectations
• 1.5 – Somewhat less than expectations
• 1 – Inadequately short of expectations 4

 

5. Career development of Broadcast executive


Discuss and agree (as far as is possible, given budgetary, availability and authorisation considerations) the training and development support to be given to help the appraisee meet the agreed objectives above.

 

6. Overall rating of Broadcast executive:


• Exceptional
• Strong
• Fully Competent
• Continued Development
• Poor
• New to Position

Other comments:

 

7. Signatures


Name of Manager
Designation
Signature
Date

Appraisal acceptable to Employee: Yes / No Date
Signature

Broadcast executive’s Signature
Comments, if any
New Title (if applicable)
Date

Distribution: (1) Copy to HR departmental Personnel File (2) Copy to line manager. (3) Copy to Manager / Supervisor.

Please note that, forms of performance appraisal can be peer form, self-appraisal form, sub-ordinate form, 360 degree form, MBO template, review phrases, HR dept comments…

Broadcast director performance appraisal




You can use suggestions below to make performance appraisal for Broadcast director. You should that the appraisal depends on appraisal method (ref 11 methods of performance appraisal), appraisal form (ref top 20 performance appraisal forms) and appraisal system.
                                                             

1. Employee Details


• Employee Name
• Review Period
• Position
• Date of joining
• Department
• Review Date
• Line Manager

 

2. Work performance of Broadcast director


How to identify work performance of Broadcast director?

• Setting up KRA, duties, responsibilities.
• Identify weight point of each KRA/duty/responsibility.

Using the 4-point scale below, please assess your employee performance in the following areas:

• 4 – Performance was always successful, consistent and respectable and at times clearly superior and exceeding standards.
• 3.5 – Performance was at most times clearly superior and exceeding standards.
• 3 – Performance was successful, consistent, and respectable in every regard with few exceptions.
• 2.5 – Performance at times was inconsistent and did not meet standards.
• 2 – Performance at most times was inconsistent and did not always meet standards.
• 1 – Performance was overall unsuccessful and unacceptable with regard to expectations and the requirements of the position.

Then, you can create a table with columns: No, KRAs, weight, performance score, descriptions.

 

3. Job objectives of Broadcast director


List the objectives you set out for your staff (Broadcast director) to achieve in the past 12 months (or the period covered by this appraisal) with the measures or standards agreed – against each comment on achievement or otherwise, with reasons where appropriate.

Score the performance against each objective (1-3 = poor, 4-6 = satisfactory, 7-9 = good, 10 = excellent):

Then you create a table with columns: No – Objectives – Measure/standard - Score - Comment

 

4. Job competencies


Discuss and agree the skills, capabilities and experience required for competence in current role, and if appropriate, for readiness to progress to the next role or roles.

Using the 4 point scale below, fill up the following table:

• 4 – Exceeds expectations
• 3.5 – Somewhat Exceeds Expectations
• 3 – Meets expectations
• 2.5 – Somewhat meets expectations
• 2 – Less than expectations
• 1.5 – Somewhat less than expectations
• 1 – Inadequately short of expectations 4

 

5. Career development of Broadcast director


Discuss and agree (as far as is possible, given budgetary, availability and authorisation considerations) the training and development support to be given to help the appraisee meet the agreed objectives above.

 

6. Overall rating of Broadcast director:


• Exceptional
• Strong
• Fully Competent
• Continued Development
• Poor
• New to Position

Other comments:

 

7. Signatures


Name of Manager
Designation
Signature
Date

Appraisal acceptable to Employee: Yes / No Date
Signature

Broadcast director’s Signature
Comments, if any
New Title (if applicable)
Date

Distribution: (1) Copy to HR departmental Personnel File (2) Copy to line manager. (3) Copy to Manager / Supervisor.

Please note that, forms of performance appraisal can be peer form, self-appraisal form, sub-ordinate form, 360 degree form, MBO template, review phrases, HR dept comments…

Broadcast controller performance appraisal




You can use suggestions below to make performance appraisal for Broadcast controller. You should that the appraisal depends on appraisal method (ref 11 methods of performance appraisal), appraisal form (ref top 20 performance appraisal forms) and appraisal system.
                                                             

1. Employee Details


• Employee Name
• Review Period
• Position
• Date of joining
• Department
• Review Date
• Line Manager

 

2. Work performance of Broadcast controller


How to identify work performance of Broadcast controller?

• Setting up KRA, duties, responsibilities.
• Identify weight point of each KRA/duty/responsibility.

Using the 4-point scale below, please assess your employee performance in the following areas:

• 4 – Performance was always successful, consistent and respectable and at times clearly superior and exceeding standards.
• 3.5 – Performance was at most times clearly superior and exceeding standards.
• 3 – Performance was successful, consistent, and respectable in every regard with few exceptions.
• 2.5 – Performance at times was inconsistent and did not meet standards.
• 2 – Performance at most times was inconsistent and did not always meet standards.
• 1 – Performance was overall unsuccessful and unacceptable with regard to expectations and the requirements of the position.

Then, you can create a table with columns: No, KRAs, weight, performance score, descriptions.

 

3. Job objectives of Broadcast controller


List the objectives you set out for your staff (Broadcast controller) to achieve in the past 12 months (or the period covered by this appraisal) with the measures or standards agreed – against each comment on achievement or otherwise, with reasons where appropriate.

Score the performance against each objective (1-3 = poor, 4-6 = satisfactory, 7-9 = good, 10 = excellent):

Then you create a table with columns: No – Objectives – Measure/standard - Score - Comment

 

4. Job competencies


Discuss and agree the skills, capabilities and experience required for competence in current role, and if appropriate, for readiness to progress to the next role or roles.

Using the 4 point scale below, fill up the following table:

• 4 – Exceeds expectations
• 3.5 – Somewhat Exceeds Expectations
• 3 – Meets expectations
• 2.5 – Somewhat meets expectations
• 2 – Less than expectations
• 1.5 – Somewhat less than expectations
• 1 – Inadequately short of expectations 4

 

5. Career development of Broadcast controller


Discuss and agree (as far as is possible, given budgetary, availability and authorisation considerations) the training and development support to be given to help the appraisee meet the agreed objectives above.

 

6. Overall rating of Broadcast controller:


• Exceptional
• Strong
• Fully Competent
• Continued Development
• Poor
• New to Position

Other comments:

 

7. Signatures


Name of Manager
Designation
Signature
Date

Appraisal acceptable to Employee: Yes / No Date
Signature

Broadcast controller’s Signature
Comments, if any
New Title (if applicable)
Date

Distribution: (1) Copy to HR departmental Personnel File (2) Copy to line manager. (3) Copy to Manager / Supervisor.

Please note that, forms of performance appraisal can be peer form, self-appraisal form, sub-ordinate form, 360 degree form, MBO template, review phrases, HR dept comments…